Download
1 / 71
710 likes | 964 Views
Crop Insurance Update: How should we in Extension talk about crop insurance to farmers?. Paul D. Mitchell Agricultural & Applied Economics, UW-Madison North Central Farm Management Extension committee Madison, WI May 13, 2009. Goal Today.
E N D
Crop Insurance Update: How should we in Extension talk about crop insurance to farmers? Paul D. Mitchell Agricultural & Applied Economics, UW-Madison North Central Farm Management Extension committee Madison, WI May 13, 2009
Goal Today • Overview how my crop insurance extension has evolved over the last few years • Seeking feedback on what you think • Especially seeking ideas on what you find that works and does not work in your efforts • Generate discussion on crop insurance and risk management extension education
Overview • Present slides from my presentations to give you an idea of what I do • Go very fast • Focus on the method of presentation, not on the content of the slides
Crop Insurance Extension • What is crop insurance & risk management • Explain policies and terminology • Hints for using crop insurance in 20XX • Benefits of crop insurance • Histograms and average net returns by coverage level for different average yields • Average net returns for GRP • Practices and Experience with crop insurance • Typical farmer practices with crop insurance • Farmer loss ratios with crop insurance
Types of Policies • APH (MPCI): Actual Production History • Individual Yield Insurance • CRC: Crop Revenue Coverage • Individual Revenue Insurance • GRP: Group Risk Plan • Area-wide (County) Yield Insurance • GRIP: Group Risk Income Protection • Area-wide (County) Revenue Insurance
Four Main Types of Policies • Catastrophic coverage (CAT) • 50% coverage level 55% price election • APH, GRP, GRIP (not CRC) • AGR-Lite: Insure Schedule F income
Your Choices • Once choose which (if any) policy you want, you then have other choices • Coverage Level: sets your guarantee level, or your “deductible” • Price Election: how much you want to be paid when you have a loss • Unit Structure: legally define how group insured fields • Optional, Basic, or Enterprise units
Crop Insurance/Risk Managementfor Vegetable Producers • Primarily Education • What is Risk? What is Risk Management? • Where crop insurance fits into risk management for vegetable growers • Explain specifics of AGR-Lite
Major Categories of Agricultural Risk • Production and Technical Risk • Market and Price Risk • Financial Risk • Human Resource Risk • Legal and Institutional Risk Go over each and provide examples
Tools to Manage Risks Numerous risk management tools exist, but they generally fall into these 3 categories 1) Reduce variability of outcomes 2) Maintain decision making flexibility 3) Improve risk bearing capability I’ll overview some tools to manage these risks and how they fit into these categories to give you the idea
Example Tools to Reduce Income Variability • Insurance • Crop insurance (more on this later) • Business liability insurance • Inputs • Productive and protective inputs • Legal advice • Diversification
Summary and Outputs • Fact Sheets and meeting overheads • An Overview of Federal Crop Insurance in Wisconsin: 22 page summary of everything • Does not seem to go very far • Either already know it, or too detailed and beyond them • Gets me phone calls and emails for crop insurance questions
Hints for Using Crop Insurance • Boil it down to two pages with bullet points of recommendations
Hints for Using Crop Insurance in 2008 • Why think about crop insurance this year? • Yield Risk: (probably) the same as it has always been • Price Risk: increased because volatility has increased with crop prices • Investment Risk: high input costs mean larger investment in planted fields: want more protection against crop failure/loss
CRC Revenue Insurance will be popular • Price and investment risks are more important this year • CRC offers price risk protection based on CBOT futures prices • CRC offers a revenue guarantee to protect your investment in crop inputs • Can market more aggressively since you will have the grain or the indemnities to buy grain at existing market prices if you have a yield loss • Dairy/Livestock farmers: CRC means can buy grain at existing market prices if have yield loss
Crop Insurance Hints for 2008 • Coverage Level for APH and CRC • 70-75% most popular and typically maximizes expected returns (or pretty close) • Sometimes 65% or 80% are better, but often not by much in terms of expected returns • 80% and 85% CRC often quite expensive and don’t increase expected returns that much • Price Election for APH: take 100% • Most poplar, maximizes expected returns • If have a loss, want largest payment possible
Premiums much higher in 2008 • Premiums are proportional to prices: 10% price increase = 10% premium increase • Rise fast after 75% coverage (less subsidy) Calumet County 2007 farmer premiums for corn with 150 bu/A APH yield
Unit Structure • All coverage is at the unit level: if total yield for a unit falls below its guarantee, triggers indemnity payments • Units: Optional, Basic, and Enterprise Units • Get as many Optional Units as you can • More likely trigger a payment if have a loss • Worth slightly larger cost for optional units • WI data: larger farms, CRC with many units
GRP/GRIP • Yield Basis: Value of GRP/GRIP depends on how your yield moves with county yield • Potentially useful for irrigated farmers or those with short (or no) yield histories • Offset irrigation costs in dry years • Use while build yield history • Combine GRP/GRIP with crop hail • GRIP: cheap way to get price protection • Larger/low risk farms use it as well
GRP/GRIP for Corn in Wisconsin • Important issue for Corn: Which county yield do you choose to insure, yield per planted acre or yield per harvested acre? • Only in Wisconsin is there a choice • Because of dairy, in years with marginal corn yields, poorer corn chopped for silage • Yield per harvested acre can remain high, even though it’s a bad year • Which is better? Depends on the county!
Summary and Outputs • Fact Sheets and meeting overheads • Parts get quoted in newspapers • Seems to get more “traffic” • Does not change much from year to year, so hard to write/update
Benefits of crop insurance • Benefits of crop insurance • Histograms and average net returns by coverage level for different average yields • Average net returns for GRP
Benefit of Crop Insurance • Crop yield is uncertain: money borrowed, inputs bought, crop planted without knowing for certain how much yield will you get at harvest • Each possible yield has a probability and farmers usually have some idea of the likelihood of each yield outcome • Implies a yield distribution or histogram
Corn Yield Histogram Monte Carlo simulations in Excel using a Beta distribution Average Yield 150 bu/ac, Standard Deviation 52.5 bu/ac Coefficient of Variation (CV) = StDev/Avg = 35% Minimum 0 bu/ac, Maximum 255 bu/ac
Effect of Crop Insurance • With crop insurance you pay a premium no matter what happens, and receive an indemnity only if your yield is below the yield guarantee • The premium reduces your returns in all outcomes (shifts the distribution down/left) • The indemnity puts a “floor” on your returns so you will receive at least your yield guarantee (piles up histogram at the yield guarantee)
Same yield distribution as before, plus crop insurance Yield guarantee = 50% coverage X 150 bu/ac = 75 bu/ac See “pile up” of yield outcomes at the 75 bu/ac guarantee Hard to see the slight shift due to the premium reducing returns, clearest at right end: blue higher than maroon bars
Effect of Coverage Level: Higher coverage shifts yield “floor” right (75 bu, 98 bu, 128 bu), makes higher “pile” at the floor since receive indemnities more often • Hard to see effect of higher premiums on upper end
Main Point and Next Question • Crop insurance reduces risk by eliminating low yield outcomes for a relatively small price (the premium) • Higher coverage levels give greater risk reduction, but have higher premiums • Government subsidizes premiums, so crop insurance is supposed to be a winning bet. • Is this true???—Do you on average make money with APH???
Is APH worth it? • Monte Carlo simulations to estimate net return = average indemnity – premium • Corn price: $3.30/bu • Vary mean yields • 120 to 160 bu/ac dryland corn • 170 to 210 irrigated corn • 30 to 50 bu/ac dryland soybeans • Yield Coefficient of Variation (CV) • 25% to 35% for dryland corn and soybeans • 20% to 35% for irrigated corn
Corn APH Net Returns ($/ac) by Coverage Level Medium Risk (left) and High Risk (right) Adams (top) and Juneau (btm)
APH for Dryland Corn in Adams and Juneau Counties • To make money on average with APH, need • Higher yield risk/variability (more indemnities) • Higher average yield (lower premiums) • Best deal is 70%-80% coverage • On average, will not make or lose much money (± about $3/ac) • Avoid high coverage levels with low average yield • Higher coverage levels better with higher average yield • Remember: APH still gives risk benefit of no low yields (creates yield “floor”)
Do similar analysis for GRP • Average GRP net return (bu/ac) by county • Linear time trend regression of county yield and estimated standard error of regression • WI: for corn must choose yield per planted acre vs yield per harvested acre
Is GRP a good deal for my Corn and Soybeans? • Bulletins posted on my webpage (soybeans soon) • Analyze county yield data and estimate the expected return to GRP in bu/ac for each Wisconsin county that has GRP • Expected return = long run average net return to GRP if everything constant over many years • If GRP is valuable for a county, GRIP will be valuable too, as it adds price protection • If GRP is not valuable for a county, GRIP can still make sense, to get the price protection
> 1 0 to 1 -1 to 0 -2 to -1 < -2 No Data Expected Net Return (bu/ac) to corn GRP using the Harvested Acres Option, regression estimated expected yield
> 1 0 to 1 -1 to 0 -2 to -1 < -2 No Data Expected Net Return (bu/ac) to corn GRP using the Planted Acres Option, regression estimated expected yield
Planted Acres Harvested Acres > 1 0 to 1 -1 to 0 -2 to -1 < -2 No Data > 1 0 to 1 -1 to 0 -2 to -1 < -2 No Data Side-by side comparison (regression yields)
> 1 0 to 1 -1 to 0 -2 to -1 < -2 No Data Expected Net Return (bu/ac) to corn GRP using the Harvested Acres Option, RMA estimated expected yield
> 1 0 to 1 -1 to 0 -2 to -1 < -2 No Data Expected Net Return (bu/ac) to corn GRP using the Planted Acres Option, RMA estimated expected yield
Planted Acres Harvested Acres Side-by side comparison (RMA yields)
Summary and Outputs • Fact Sheets and meeting overheads • Tables of numbers and plots of net returns by coverage level: Too complicated!!! • GRP maps pretty, but small market • Still only presents average net return to crop insurance—ignores risk benefit
Practices and Experience • What are farmers are doing with crop insurance? • Typical practices • What does crop insurance do for farmers? • Loss ratios • Let farmers compare themselves to “typical” WI farmer
Wisconsin farmers and crop insurance • Relative to neighboring states, WI a low participation state in crop insurance • CRC the most popular coverage, then APH, then GRIP, then GRP • APH CAT policies used by sizeable minority
WI vs. neighboring states% planted acres insured in 2007 WI in 2004: 54% corn, 63% Soybeans, 33% Wheat
WI Farmer Practices • Lots of WI grain acres could be insured • CRC most popular among those buying insurance • Slightly larger than average sized farms buy it • Use more than average number of units • APH popular among smaller farms • Use fewer than average number of units • GRIP (and GRP) popular among largest farms
Crop Insurance in Dane County 2008 Using 2007 Dane County acres: Corn = 63%, Soybeans = 79% acres insured in 2008
