4. Study Description
Autonomous VTOL Scalable Logistics
Architecture (AVSLA)
• Architecture study
• Air vehicle independent
• Study seeks to answer three questions about an
AVSLA:
– How are decisions made?
– How are routes determined?
– How are responses timed?
• Focus on Northeast U.S. corridor and regional
military engagement.
6. Future Operations
The future offers:
• Automated request
generation
• More intelligent
decision maker
• Improved delivery
timing
All logistics networks use the same system components.
New architectures require improved components.
7. AVSLA Benefits
• Autonomy
– “request and forget”
– reduced staffing lowers operating costs
– allows integration with future automatic ordering
• VTOL
– flexibility (increases available landing sites)
– minimizes transport infrastructure investment
• Scalable
– responsive to changes in demand level and structure
– future growth is designed into the system
8. Key Questions
The study seeks to answer 3 key questions:
• How are decisions made?
– distributed vs. centralized decision making
• How are routes determined?
– routing efficiency vs. system flexibility
• How are responses timed?
– scheduled service vs. priority and posture-based
scheduling
9. Decision Making Models
• Dictatorship
– controlled by a single central unit
• Oligarchy
– a few power centers make all decisions
• Republic
– elected representatives decide together
– geographic or functional constituencies
• Democracy
– all members have equal participation
– can be global or organic
10. Routing Options
• Prescribed
– destinations and routes are pre-defined
– minimal flexibility
• Constrained
– routes are variable, but constrained
– constraints may be static or dynamic
• Unconstrained
– “free flight”
11. Scheduling Options
• Scheduled service
– reliable customer expectations
– “public transit” syndrome -- no ability to react to emergencies or
high priorities
• Priority-based service
– pickup and delivery times are based on priority
– who decides what items are high-priority in a multi-user
environment?
• Posture-based service
– timings are based on current asset posture
• Predictive-adaptive service
– future response is pre-planned based on past experience
12. Work Plan
1.Logistics Analysis
– determine the type, amount, and urgency of cargo being
carried in the study area.
– understand baseline “hub and spoke” system
– develop architecture evaluation metrics
– evaluate alternate concepts
2.System Architecture Concept Creation
3.Economic Analysis
13. Work Plan
1.Logistics Analysis
2.System Architecture Definition
– generate an integrated concept based on results of step 1
– establish vehicle and information technology
requirements for each architecture
– conceptualize air vehicles
– determine technology requirements and opportunities for
risk reduction
3.Economic Analysis
14. Work Plan
1.Logistics Analysis
2. System Architecture Concept Creation
3.Economic Analysis
– establish required initial capital investment
– determine break even requirements
– examine investment savings
– study applicability to military supply environment
18. Relevant Sikorsky Experience
ACA Cypher Package Express
The Advanced Cargo Aircraft study, conducted for the U.S.
Army in 1990, evaluated the loads that the Army needed to
transport and determined the aircraft parameters that would
best fulfill Army needs. This study required an
understanding of the transport needs and methods employed
by the Army.
19. Relevant Sikorsky Experience
ACA Cypher Package Express
The Cypher UAV was developed
by Sikorsky. It has successfully
demonstrated several autonomous
flight modes:
• hover
• takeoff
• landing
• waypoint navigation
20. Relevant Sikorsky Experience
ACA Cypher Package Express
The Package Express AHS student design competition was
sponsored by Sikorsky and was based on the requirements and
desires of Federal Express. The project examined the feasibility
of creating a VTOL cargo transport network to improve FedEx
operations.
21. Payoffs
It is intended that this study will produce
• Logistics needs of customers
• Preferred system architecture that drives
– Technology requirements for AVSLA
– Vehicle requirements for AVSLA
– IT requirements for AVSLA
– Required autonomous capabilities for AVSLA
vehicles
22. Future Work
Planned Phase II efforts will include:
• Better definition of air vehicle requirements
• Refinement of autonomous operation mode
requirements
• Robustness of scalability
– National scale
– Local scale
• Applicability to other geographic areas
• Non-terrestrial applications
23. Opportunities for Collaboration
Phase I
– current transportation infrastructure
– package handling
– architecture input
Phase II
– National Airspace integration (autonomous flight over
population centers?)
– vehicle requirements refinement
– national-scale architecture requirements
– extra-terrestrial and non-planetary applications
24. Opportunities for Collaboration
Beyond NIAC
– control algorithm development
– autonomous cargo handling robotics
– “order-to-delivery” system integration
– vehicle design
– concept demonstration
25. Opportunities for Collaboration
Potential Partners Include
– Department of Transportation
– Express Package Industry
– Department of Defense
– Federal Aviation Administration
– NASA
– Academia
